Is it necessary for the trial judge to determine whether this residence was unfit for habitation? The case of Biegler v. Stacey (1995) 172 A.R. 57 stands for the proposition that in order for a purchase of a residential property to have a cause of action against a vendor for fraudulent concealment, the concealed defect had to affect the fitness of the home for habitation purposes.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.