Turning to the legal framework, the leading case is Bearhead v. Moorhouse. I am not going to give the citation. The first test set out in that case is whether the application was brought promptly. Quite clearly, in my view, it was not. The writ expired September 2000. The application to renew was not instigated until June of 2002, and then, as I have indicated, it still proceeded extremely sluggishly. So quite clearly, in my view, the application has not been brought promptly.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.