The appellant says the trial judge erred: 1) in stating the test for causation and her reference to Athey v. Leonati 1996 CanLII 183 (SCC), [1996] 3 S.C.R. 458; 2) In misunderstanding the impact of the evidence concerning the plaintiff’s original position; and 3) In assessing damages for loss of future earning capacity both because of errors with respect to the effect of Athey, her misunderstanding of the evidence and because she took an approach which was too mathematical.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.