As stated by Ground J. in Aspiotis v. Coffee Time Donuts Inc.: [See Note 13 below] The defendants' expert proceeded on the basis of calculating the anticipated annual profits from the franchise business and calculated damages based upon the loss of such profits for a reasonable period of time during which the plaintiff might have been expected to pursue an alternative business opportunity. In my view, the latter approach is the correct approach. The claim for damages is based on loss of opportunity and clearly the plaintiff would have an obligation to mitigate such damages. He is not entitled to claim damages based upon the amount he would have to pay to acquire a business which would earn him annually for in indefinite period the amount of the anticipated profits from the franchise operation. He is clearly obligated to mitigate his losses by pursing a reasonable alternative business opportunity.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.