The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Rojo-Mendoza, 1996 WL 183489, 83 F.3d 430 (9th Cir. 1996):
Rojo-Mendoza's confrontation rights were not violated at the revocation hearing because he was given the opportunity to challenge the plea agreement evidence. See United States v. Martin, 984 F.2d 308, 311-12 (9th Cir.1993).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.