The standard of review that must be met on an appeal of an order relating to access was described in D.W.H. v. D.J.R, 2007 ABCA 57 at para. 12 - 13, 412 A.R. 34: While chambers decisions in cases involving custody and access are entitled to considerable deference, an appellate court will intervene if there is a material error, a serious misapprehension of the evidence or an error of law: Van de Perre v. Edwards, 2001 SCC 60, [2001] 2 S.C.R. 1014.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.