On appeal, with respect to the claims that were dismissed, the appellants argue that the motion judge’s order and reasons are vague, creating confusion as to what claims may and may not be pursued; that he erred in applying this court’s decision in Harris v. Levine, 2014 ONCA 608, leave to appeal ref’d, [2014] S.C.C.A. No. 467; that he failed to appreciate that he had discretion not to apply issue estoppel; and that this is a proper case to exercise discretion to allow relitigation.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.