The Appellant’s suggestion that he is entitled to a stay of proceedings cannot be seriously entertained. It is abundantly clear that a stay of proceedings is only appropriate in the clearest of cases. It is appropriate where the prejudice to an individual’s right to make full answer and defence cannot be remedied or where irreparable prejudice would be caused to the integrity of the judicial system if this conviction were allowed to stand. (See Regina v. O’Connor 1995 CanLII 51 (SCC), [1995] 4 S.C.R. 411 at paragraph 82).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.