What is the test for a teacher to be entitled to medical malpractice benefits during a non-teaching period?

In order for the Appellant to be entitled to benefits during a non-teaching period, she would have to demonstrate that one of the following conditions in subsection 33(2) of the Regulations applied to her. She would have to show that her “contract of employment for teaching has terminated”, as in paragraph 33(2)(a), or that her employment in teaching “was on a casual or substitute basis,” as in 33(2)(b), or that she “qualifies to receive benefits in respect of employment in an occupation other than teaching,” as per 33(2)(c). These are three distinct exceptions, separate and independent from each other (Attorney General v. Blanchet et al. 2007 FCA 377).