A motions judge hearing an appeal from a decision rendered by a prothonotary is guided by the principles outlined in Canada v. Aqua-Gem Investments Ltd. 1993 CanLII 2939 (FCA), [1993] 2 F.C. 425, that discretionary orders of prothonotaries ought not to be disturbed on appeal unless they are clearly wrong, in the sense that the exercise of the discretion was based upon a wrong principle or misapprehension of the facts, or they raise questions vital to the final issue of the case.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.