Appeals from decisions of courts on points of law are reviewed for correctness. An error of law which is extractable from a mixed question of fact and law similarly is subject to the correctness standard. Factual matters, including inferences, and mixed questions of fact and law with no extractable error of law are reviewed for palpable and overriding error. Housen v. Nickolaisen, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 325, at paras. 8, 10, 19-25, 31-36. . . .
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.