It is well established that an appellate court should not interfere with an interlocutory order which involves the exercise of discretion, unless it is clearly and demonstratively wrong. This is especially so in interlocutory matters involving family matters where appeals are to be discouraged. See Bergen v. Sharpe, 2011 ONSC 1930 (CanLII), [2011] O.J. No. 1482. Appeals from interlocutory orders in family matters have been historically discouraged as they will generally only add additional expense to the parties and delay the final resolution at trial.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.