Animosity between the executor and a beneficiary alone is not on its own sufficient to warrant removal of an executor: Letterstedt v. Broers (1884), 9 A.C. 371 at 389 (P.C.); see also 385–6. However, animosity between co-executors can be relevant to whether it is reasonable to expect they can work effectively and efficiently together to carry out their duties. Thus, in Levi-Bandel v. McKeen, 2011 BCSC 247, Mr. Justice Butler removed a co-executrix to address paralysis arising from difficulties between co-executors:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.