What is the effect of the adjournment application at the BC Human Rights Tribunal?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Williams v. Calling Foundation and others (No. 3), 2007 BCHRT 75 (CanLII):

This is the third adjournment application in this file. The previous applications were dealt with by the Tribunal in Williams v. Calling Foundation and others, 2006 BCHRT 348 (“Williams No. 1”), and Williams v. Calling Foundation and others (No. 2), 2006 BCHRT 489 (“Williams No. 2”).

Other Questions


In what circumstances will the Respondent at the Human Rights Tribunal of B.C. claim that the Applicant be denied the right to continue to pursue his human rights claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether the Human Rights Tribunal of BC has jurisdiction to hear a human rights complaint against the respondent? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has the BC Human Rights Tribunal treated the discriminatory application of a policy in discrimination cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the Human Rights Tribunal make findings of fact on a s. 27(1)(c) application? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of the rules of interminable adjournment of an application to dismiss an application? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the meaning of the language of the Canadian Human Rights Code in the context of human rights legislation? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a plaintiff bring an application for an adjournment, mid trial, despite previous rulings denying adjournments? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for having to have an oral hearing at the BC Human Rights Tribunal? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is this settlement effectively resolved a human rights complaint? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the legal test for having to have an oral hearing at the BC Human Rights Tribunal? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.