Acts which satisfy prior commitments, such as delivering documents one has previously promised to supply, are often not things which, in and of themselves, materially advance an action. The spirit of R. 244.1 would be circumvented if one party delayed completion of an agreement or undertaking and thereby restarted the five-year clock at a later date. See Smith v. Alberta (1996), 49 C.P.C. (3d) 94 (Master) in which complying with an undertaking in one’s own lawsuit did not materially advance an action. An action may be materially advanced by other things, even though they are not procedural steps.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.