I adopt, however, the reasoning of Mr. Justice McDermid in Armstrong v. Ruby, [2004] O.J. No. 6145 (S.C.J.) at paragraph 15, where he says that access is a privilege granted to the Father and it must be in the child’s best interests. It is not a right that the Father enjoys absolutely. Mr. Justice McDermid, in Armstrong, supra, then changed the access to a new plan which he said, “…is in Simon’s best interests and that it will also educate the husband to put Simon’s best interests before his own.”
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.