Is a self-represented party entitled to a loss of opportunity cost for time spent conducting litigation?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from The Toronto-Dominion Bank v Froom, 2016 ONSC 3695 (CanLII):

A self-represented party does not incur legal fees. If a self-represented party is employed and earning an income, he may incur a loss of opportunity cost if he spends time conducting the litigation that would otherwise have been spent earning an income. There must be some evidence of the income and the fact that it has decreased as a result of the litigation. It does not need to be detailed. Even if the evidence is thin, it may be sufficient to prove a loss of opportunity cost. If the loss is proved, a self- represented party is entitled to a reasonable allowance for the loss of his time to conduct the litigation. (see Miller v. De-Bartolo-Taylor et al, 2013 ONSC 6791)

Other Questions


Is a comment made by a party to a party’s communications entitled to be impugned as a matter of public interest? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a self-represented party entitled to his costs including any loss of opportunity cost? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a crown attorney acting for the applicant in a litigation between parties not providing a service to the opposing party? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a litigation guardian required to approve a partial settlement that includes payment of 15% plus party and party costs to solicitors? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the effect of an interim order establishing that a party is entitled to litigant status? (Ontario, Canada)
If a successful party accepts an offer to settle, can the successful party be ordered to pay all or part of the unsuccessful party’s costs? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a self-represented litigant entitled to recover costs from the other party? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a party entitled to rely on the fact that another party has retained counsel for advice in the negotiation process? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a party entitled to make costs submissions at every stage of the litigation? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a person entitled under a statutory superannuation scheme entitled to a garnishment under the Employee Benefit Scheme entitled to be garnished after they have ceased employment? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.