[29] A police officer lacking reasonable and probable ground to make a demand to a person to provide breath samples in a breathalyzer machine, may pursuant to section 254(2) of the Criminal Code, make a roadside screening demand, in an Approved Screening Device (ASD), if the officer “reasonably suspects” that a person operating a motor vehicle “has alcohol” in his or her body. That is to say, a peace officer can request the screening test merely upon entertaining a reasonable suspicion that alcohol is in a person’s body. A “fail” result may be considered, along with any other indicia of impairment, in order to provide the police officer with the necessary reasonable and probable grounds to make a breathalyzer demand. In order to satisfy this requirement, the officer must have both objective and subjective grounds for this suspicion. (see R v. Bernshaw 1995 CanLII 150 (SCC), 1995 CanLII 150 (S.C.C.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.