What is the impact of a hypothetical possibility in the context of the Court of Arbitration for Sport?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Watts v Lindsay, 2019 BCSC 2239 (CanLII):
A hypothetical possibility will be taken into consideration as long as it is a real and substantial possibility and not mere speculation: Athey at para. 27; and Morlan v. Barrett, 2012 BCCA 66 at para. 38.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the impact of a future or hypothetical possibility on the law in the context of the Court of Appeal? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Supreme Court in BCSC 871 interpret the principles of the Court of Appeal in the context of the Canadian Court of Justice's decision on the doctrine of common law? (British Columbia, Canada)
In the context of the BCCA's submission to the Court of Arbitration for Sport, how have the submissions been interpreted? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a request for a lump sum lump sum of costs payable by the Board of Arbitration for Sport or the Court of Appeal appropriate? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the impact of Justice Griffin's comments in the context of the Court of Appeal's decision in the case of the unsuccessful party seeking special costs against the successful party? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the principles and the two approaches a court should consider in assessing damages under the Rules of Arbitration for Sport? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for withdrawing an application to withdraw an admission by a member of the Court of Arbitration for Sport? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the impact of a future or hypothetical possibility on an individual's health? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the case law on the principles of the Court of Arbitration for Sport? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is the Chief Justice of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of B.C holding that the Court has jurisdiction to determine whether a person who is not a party to a particular type of tortfeasor has a valid claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
