A franchisor may be a proper respondent to a human rights complaint arising out of its franchisee’s employment relationships or services: Maycock v. Canadian Tire Corporation Limited and another, 2004 BCHRT 33. A franchisor may be liable if it exercises such a degree of control over the acts or omissions alleged in the complaint that it can be said that the franchisor is itself providing a service or employing the employees in question: Maycock at para. 46.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.