A decision regarding costs is a discretionary decision and, as noted above, s. 59(3) of the Administrative Tribunals Act provides that discretionary decisions must not be set aside unless they are patently unreasonable. Section 59(4) of the Act states that a discretionary decision is patently unreasonable if the discretion: (a) is exercised arbitrarily or in bad faith, (b) is exercised for an improper purpose, (c) is based entirely or predominantly on irrelevant factors, or (d) fails to take statutory requirements into account. One of the listed circumstances must be demonstrated in order to establish that a discretionary decision is patently unreasonable: see Berezoutskaia v. British Columbia (Human Rights Tribunal), 2006 BCCA 95, 51 B.C.L.R. (4th) 4 at para. 19.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.