Does an appointment for Examination for Discovery not advance the suit?
Alberta, Canada
The following excerpt is from Lloydminster (City) v Alberta Asphalt Enterprises, 2022 ABQB 55 (CanLII):
In Bourne v. Alberta, 2008 ABCA 165, it was observed at para 5 that an appointment for Examination for Discovery does not advance the suit, only an actual Examination for Discovery does.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Can an examination for discovery be used as evidence against the party who conducted the examination? (Alberta, Canada)
Is an examination for discovery or an interrogatory? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a call to testify for discovery or production of documents in the way of discovery? (Alberta, Canada)
Can an examination for discovery transcript be filed? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a police officer cross-examine for discovery? (Alberta, Canada)
Does the fact that an executor of an estate has not been examined for discovery of the estate be considered invalid? (Alberta, Canada)
Does the examination for discovery by a defendant constitute a step in an action? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a Plaintiff withdraw a portion of an examination for discovery after it has been put in evidence? (Alberta, Canada)
What rights does a witness have to be examined for discovery? (Alberta, Canada)
Can an order appointing an administrator ad litem be substituted because there is an existing executorship? (Alberta, Canada)
