As to s. 95, Harris J.A. agreed (at para. 41) with the description of “significantly unfair” in Remmem v. Remmem, 2014 BCSC 1552, where Mr. Justice Butler described the standard (at para. 44) as “compelling or meaningful having regard to the factors set out in s. 95(2)”. Justice Harris added that “significantly unfair” requires evidence that rises to the level of “something objectively unjust, unreasonable or unfair in some important or substantial sense” (at para. 42).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.