The following excerpt is from Manulife Bank of Canada v. Conlin, [1996] 3 SCR 415, 1996 CanLII 182 (SCC):
77 However, this right to be discharged as a result of a material variation of the principal contract can be waived by the surety. As McIntyre J. said in Bauer v. Bank of Montreal, 1980 CanLII 12 (SCC), [1980] 2 S.C.R. 102, at p. 107, “it is open to the parties to make their own arrangements, and a surety is competent to contract himself out of the protection of the equitable rule”. The question to be resolved, therefore, is whether clause 34 amounts to a waiver of the respondent’s equitable rights. Before dealing with this question, I believe it would be helpful to discuss briefly some of the interpretive principles relating to guarantees. (a) Interpretive principles relating to guarantees
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.