Dureau v. Kemp-West Enterprises Ltd., [1989] B.C.J. No. 2123, cited by Investors counsel as an example of implied statements covered by s. 59, is distinguishable on the basis that there the statements under consideration were express statements in the prospectus in relation to the removal of peat from the site, where it was found by the court that the wording left the impression that all the unstable soil had been removed. The court concluded that the express statements were false and they were deceptive or misleading as partial truths.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.