In Singer, Strathy J. concluded his discussion on this point, at para. 136, by stating: It has been suggested that on a motion for certification the court plays an important gate keeping function to ensure that the proceeding is in fact suitable for certification. In this case, there is no evidence of a class or two or more people seeking access to justice. In a case where all the other requirements of s.5(1) of the CPA had been met, it might be appropriate to follow the approach of Cullity J. in Lambert v. Guidant Corp.[ie. conduct the analysis under the preferable procedure requirement], but in my view this is not such a case (citations omitted).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.