Is it necessary for an applicant to prove a breach of the standard of care with expert evidence?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Nijjar v. Singh, 2021 BCCRT 207 (CanLII):

25. In claims of professional negligence, it is generally necessary for an applicant to prove a breach of the standard of care with expert evidence: see Bergen v. Guliker, 2015 BCCA 283, paragraphs 117-119. This is because the standards of an industry are often outside of the knowledge or expertise of an ordinary person.

Other Questions


Does a no evidence motion where a real estate agent defendant argued that there was no expert evidence sufficient to establish a standard of care? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the most obvious case in which a court may find a breach of the standard of care in the absence of expert evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for excluding evidence from the evidence of a breach of section 8 of the Charter? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of evidence used to prove the intention of a party to a transferor? (British Columbia, Canada)
When faced with contradictory evidence in a preliminary application, is it necessary to proceed to hearing? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden on a plaintiff to prove that a doctor breached the standard of care? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff required to lead expert evidence to overcome a no evidence motion? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of professional competence required to produce expert evidence in a medical malpractice case? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can an applicant and respondent at a summary trial rely on expert reports, examinations for discovery, interrogatories, use of admissions, and expert reports? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the case law on expert evidence as to the standard of care? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.