10 The general principle with respect to whether a charge is considered obsolete under Section 31(2) of the Property Law Act was dealt with by Lambert, J.A. in a concurring judgment in Chivas v. Mysek, [unreported] (December 4, 1986) Van. Reg. #CA005068 (B.C.C.A.) where he stated [at page 6]: "[I]n my opinion, the test of whether the easement or restrictive covenant or other charge is obsolete is not a test to be satisfied on the basis of balancing the rights of the parties, but rather by a consideration of the use of the relevant property and a determination of whether on those facts the charge or interest is obsolete." See also Re Crescent Beach Marina Co. (1967), supra at pp. 5-6.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.